Innovativeness of Polish industry against the global industry

Authors

  • Waldemar Gajda Warszawska Szkoła Zarządzania – Szkoła Wyższa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24917/20801653.291.3

Keywords:

barriers, innovation, industry, sources

Abstract

The main purpose of this article is an attempt to assess the innovation of the Polish industry against the global industry. The analysis method was used in the research. The achievement of economic thought relating to innovation starting from Smith’s concept to Oslo methodology was presented in this article. The level of innovation of the Polish economy was determined with the use of statistical methods as well as indirect indicators based on the research and development intensity and direct indicators based on the results of product, process, organizational and marketing innovations. Subsequently, innovative activeness, innovative activity spending as well as revenue from sale of new products of small-, medium- and large-sized Polish enterprises were analyzed. The results were evaluated and compared with the world economy. Determinants of innovative activity of Polish industry entities indicating sources, main barriers and recommendations were determined in the conclusion on the basis of the conducted analyses and evaluations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Waldemar Gajda, Warszawska Szkoła Zarządzania – Szkoła Wyższa

Waldemar Gajda, Ph.D. in economics – Ph.D. thesis defended at the Szczecin University, doctoralstudies at the Faculty of Management and Economics Services, master studies at the Faculty of Transportand Communications. His dissertation was awarded Main Prize of the Minister of Transport,Construction and Maritime Economy for the best doctoral thesis in the competition for the best tenure,master, BSc thesis concerning transport. Associate professor at the Warsaw School of Management –Academy. Member of the School Senate. Member of the Polish Economic Society, the Association ofScientific Organization and Leadership (Polish abbreviation TNOiK) – multiannual president of theresearch club operating on the WSM – HS. He focuses his main interests and scientific efforts on the issues of the operation of business entities, including especially management taking into considerationidentification and proper usage of the instruments determining operation and development of enterprises,creation of models of development based on the endogenic and exogenic instruments appearing inthe market economy. Author of numerous scientific articles at national and international conferences.He conducts his own scientific research and actively participates in research realized by his homeuniversity.

References

Chrzanowski, K. (2013, kwiecień). Polski przemysł high-tech – możliwości i bariery rozwoju. Sprawy Nauki, 179.

Działalność innowacyjna w Polsce (2014). Szczecin: GUS.

Gajda, W. (2014). The system of instruments stimulating the development strategies adopted by Central European enterprises. W: A. Marszk (red.). International context of business environment. Selected Evidence from CEE and SEE Countries. Gdańsk: Gdańsk University of Technology Publishing House, 128.

Global Innovation Index 2014. The Human Factor in Innovation (2014). Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO. Fontainebleau, Ithaca, Geneva: WIPO and CII.

Gmurczyk, J. (2014, 3 listopada). Innowacyjność polskiej gospodarki. Stan obecny i rekomendacje. Pozyskano z http://www.instytutobywatelski.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/.

Gregory, B.T., Rutherford, M.W., Oswald, S., Gardiner, L. (2005). An Empirical Investigation of the Growth Cycle of Small Firm Financing, Journal of Small Business Management, 43(4), 382–392.

Innovation Union Scoreboard 2014 (2014). European Union, Maastricht: Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT).

Kalecki, M. (1986). Teoria dynamiki gospodarczej: rozprawa o cyklicznych i długofalowych zmianach gospodarki kapitalistycznej. Warszawa: PWN.

Kamieński, Z. (2011). Foresight technologiczny przemysłu – InSight2030. Streszczenie analizy końcowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IZTECH.

Leśniak, G.J. (2013, 7 sierpnia). Ordynacja podatkowa w gruzach, trzeba nowej ustawy. Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

Marshall, A. (1920). Industrial Organization, Continued. The Concentration of Specialized Industries in Particular Localities. W: Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan and Co.

Pigou, A.C. (1932). Inventions and Improvements. W: The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan and Co.

Podręcznik Oslo. Zasady gromadzenia i interpretacji danych dotyczących innowacji (2008). OECD, Eurostat. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego, Departament Strategii i Rozwoju Nauki.

Say, J.B. (1855). Of the Labour of Mankind, of Nature, and of Machinery Respectively. W: C.C. Biddle (red.). A Treatise on Political Economy. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Grambo & Co.

Schumpeter, J. (1975). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper.

Smith, A. (1904). Of the Division of Labour. W: E. Cannan (red.). An Inquiry into the nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Methuen & Co.

Strategia innowacyjności i efektywności gospodarki. Dynamiczna Polska 2020 (2013). Warszawa: Ministerstwo Gospodarki. Instytut Badań Rynku, Konsumpcji i Koniunktur.

Tarde, G. (1902). L’invention consideree comme, moteur de l’evolution socjale. Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 7, 561–574.

Published

2015-08-30

How to Cite

Gajda, W. (2015). Innovativeness of Polish industry against the global industry. Studies of the Industrial Geography Commission of the Polish Geographical Society, 29(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.24917/20801653.291.3